Saturday May 19th 2012

Experts urge rejection of MS therapy trial

Canada should not fund a clinical trial of the so-called liberation therapy for multiple sclerosis now, an expert group has recommended.

The Canadian Institutes of Health Research and the MS Society of Canada said Tuesday in Ottawa that a group of international experts they brought together met last week to discuss the latest findings on the theory proposed by Italian doctor Paolo Zamboni.

The group unanimously recommended against supporting a clinical trial in Canada at this time, CIHR president Dr. Alain Beaudet said.

“There is an overwhelming lack of scientific evidence on the safety and efficacy of the procedure, or even that there is any link between blocked veins and MS,” Beaudet said.

Beaudet informed Health Minister Leona Aglukkaq about the group’s recommendations. She plans a news conference on the subject on Wednesday.

Chronic cerebrospinal venous insufficiency, or CCSVI, is a chronic problem in which blood from the brain has difficulty returning to the heart.

Validity questions
Zamboni believes multiple sclerosis is caused by a narrowing or “stenosis” in the veins that drain the brain that can be corrected by using balloons to open up veins.

Some Canadians are spending thousands of dollars overseas to seek the experimental treatment.

In June, both MS societies awarded a combined $2.4 million in research grants aimed at testing if Zamboni’s theory is correct, by checking for abnormal blood flow in the veins in people with MS and healthy controls using ultrasound, MRI or catheters with dye.

“We do not put all of our eggs in one basket,” said Yves Savoie, head of the MS Society of Canada.

The society is looking at many avenues to treat MS, including CCSVI, Savoie said, adding the group respects the rights of patients who’ve weighed the risks and sought the vein-opening procedure.

Zamboni’s original research was not blinded, which makes it difficult to draw conclusions about its scientific validity, said Dr. Barry Rubin, a vascular surgeon at Toronto General Hospital, who spoke to reporters from Stockholm.

Beaudet made three recommendations to Aglukkaq:

•Establish a scientific expert working group made up of four investigators from Canada and three from the U.S. funded by the MS societies in both countries, and a representative of the provinces and territories, to monitor and analyze results from studies investigating CCSVI worldwide. The group should hold its first meeting this calendar year.
•Based on the outcomes of these studies, the scientific expert working group should reach conclusions regarding the association (or lack thereof) between CCSVI and MS, and a common standard for reliably diagnosing the condition using imaging or other techniques.
•Depending on these conclusions, the scientific expert working group should make recommendations on further studies including, if appropriate, a pan-Canadian, interventional clinical trial.
Provincial calls for trial
In July, Saskatchewan Premier Brad Wall said his province would fund a clinical trial into liberation therapy, and he invited proposals from the scientific community for such a trial. Saskatchewan has Canada’s highest incidence of multiple sclerosis, Wall says.

Last week, Newfoundland and Labrador’s health minister, Jerome Kennedy, said the province will provide some funding for clinical trials of the unproven treatment.

Manitoba’s health minister, Theresa Oswald, has also called for a national clinical trial of a controversial treatment. Oswald also wants the issue discussed at next month’s meeting of federal, provincial and territorial health ministers in St. John’s.

Quebec’s health minister, Yves Bolduc, has also expressed support for a national clinical trial.

The publicly funded CIHR gives grants to researchers across the country working in health and medicine.

Read More

2 Comments for “Experts urge rejection of MS therapy trial”

  • Sheran Oberholzer says:

    What were these people experts of? Surely the angioplasty is safer than the medications neurologists don’t hesitate to prescribe. Some have been known to cause more problems than they help. Some have even caused death. Where’s the caution there? At least MSers, after angioplasty, have, for the most part, improved and most have gone off medications.

  • Kathy K says:

    Short and straight to the point! That is exactly what I am thinking. Thank you.


Leave a Comment

More from category

Appeal board rejects MS treatment claim
Appeal board rejects MS treatment claim

A tribunal has rejected an Eastern Ontario woman’s bid to force the Ontario Health Insurance Plan to pay for a [Read More]

Feds to fund clinical trial of controversial MS treatment in Canada
Feds to fund clinical trial of controversial MS treatment in Canada

Canada’s Health Minister Leona Aglukkaq announced Wednesday that the federal government will fund a clinical [Read More]

Unblocking veins in M.S.: New U.S. study supports Zamboni’s CCSVI theory
Unblocking veins in M.S.: New U.S. study supports Zamboni’s CCSVI theory

Eight months ago, on the advice of Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR) president, Alain Beaudet, federal [Read More]

Health minister tries to block bill backing controversial MS therapy
Health minister tries to block bill backing controversial MS therapy

Health Minister Leona Aglukkaq has sparked anger by aggressively opposing a private member’s bill that would [Read More]

Hundreds sign up for MS liberation trial in Saskatchewan
Hundreds sign up for MS liberation trial in Saskatchewan

The Saskatchewan government has received almost 600 applications from multiple sclerosis patients interested in [Read More]